New Em@ncipatory Landscapes? Young People With Intellectual Disabilities, Internet Use, and Identification Processes




Intellectual disability, Internet use, participation, identification processes, social networking sites (SNS)


Although research on young people’s identification processes on the Internet is a growing field, few studies illustrate conditions for young people with intellectual disabilities (ID). Previous studies have shown that young people with ID are worried about being marginalized, and that many in fact are lonelier than other young people. Internet and social networking sites might be of vital importance as a space for exploring alternative and less stigmatized identities. This article reports findings from individual interviews with 27 young people with ID in Sweden. The transcribed interviews were analyzed using a thematic content analysis. A prominent finding concerned the informants being well aware of both risks and opportunities using Internet and Social Networking Sites. Consequently, the more they interacted with non-disabled peers, the more they experienced negative consequences of Internet use. These circumstances rather lead to downsizing than upsizing Internet use, and less participation on Social Networking Sites. The experiences of the informants are discussed in a conceptual framework of social identity, participation, and emancipation. We recommend that social work practitioners reflect upon the ways that support can be arranged in order to empower young people with ID to participate on the Internet.

Author Biographies

Martin Molin, University West, Sweden

Associate Professor of Social Work

Emma Sorbring, University West


Lotta Löfgren-Mårtenson, Malmö University



Beart, S., Hardy, G., & Buchan, L. (2005). How people with intellectual disabilities view their social identity: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 18, 47-56. doi:

Boonaert, T., & Vettenburg, N. (2011). Young people’s Internet use: Divided or diversified. Childhood: A Global Journal of Child Research, 18(1), 54-66. doi:

Borland, J., & Ramcharan, P. (2000). Empowerment in informal settings. In P. Ramcharan, G. Roberts, G. Grant, & J. Borland (Eds.), Empowerment in everyday life: Learning disability (2nd ed., pp. 88-100). London: J. Kengsley.

Bowker, N., & Tuffin, K. (2003). Dicing with deception: People with disabilities’ strategies for managing safety and identity online. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 8(2). Retrieved from

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi:

Buijs, P. C. M., Boot, E. Shugar, A., Fung, W. L. A., & Bassett, A. S. (2016). Internet safety issues for adolescents and adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 30(2), 416-418. doi:

Caton, S., & Chapman, M. (2016). The use of social media and people with intellectual disability: A systematic review and thematic analysis. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 41(2), 125-139. doi:

Chadwick, D., Wesson, C., & Fullwood, C. (2013). Internet access by people with intellectual disabilities: Inequalities and opportunities. Future Internet, 5, 376-397. doi:

Didden, R., Scholte, R. H. J., Korzilius, H., De Moor, J. M. H, Vermeulen, A., O’Reilly, M., Lang, R., & Lancioni, G. E. (2009). Cyberbullying among students with intellectual and developmental disability in special education settings. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 12(3), 146-151. doi:

Emerson, E., & McVilly, K. (2004). Friendship activities of adults with intellectual disabilities in supported accommodation in northern England. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17, 191-197. doi:

Guillen, L., Coromina, L., & Saris, W. E. (2011). Measurement of social participation and its place in social capital theory. Social Indicators Research, 100, 331-350. doi:

Gustavsson, A. (1998). Inifrån utanförskapet. Om att vara annorlunda och delaktig. [Insiders’ perspectives on being an outsider]. Stockholm: Johansson and Skyttmo förlag.

Gustavsson, A., & Nyberg, C. (2015). ‘I am different, but I’m like everybody else’: The dynamics of disability identity. In R. Traustadóttir, B. Ytterhus, S. Egilson, & B. Berg (Eds.), Childhood and disability in the Nordic countries (pp. 69-84). London, Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:

Holmes, K. M., & O’Loughlin, N. (2012). The experiences of people with learning disabilities on social networking sites. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 3-7. doi:

Jenkins, R. (2007). Social identity (3rd ed.). London, Routledge Taylor & Francis.

Johansson, A. (2014). “Låt dom aldrig slå ner dig!”. Bloggen som arena för patientaktivism. [“Don’t let them bring you down!” The Blog as an arena for patient activism]. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 20, 203-220.

Karreman, J., van der Geest, T., & Buusink, E. (2007). Accessible website content guidelines for users with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 20(6), 510-518. doi:

Kennedy, H., Evans, S., & Thomas, S. (2011). Can the web be made accessible for people with intellectual disabilities? The Information Society, 27, 29-39. doi:

Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L. (Eds). (2009). Kids online: Opportunities and risks for children. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.

Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., & Ólafsson, K. (2011). EU Kids Online. London: School of Media and Economics.

Löfgren-Mårtenson, L. (2005). Kä Om Internet och unga med utvecklingsstörning [Love. Now. About Internet and young people with intellectual disabilities]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Löfgren-Mårtenson, L. (2008). Love in cyberspace. Swedish young people with intellectual disabilities and the Internet. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 10(2), 125-138. doi:

Löfgren-Mårtensson, L., Sorbring, E., & Molin, M. (2015). "T@ngled up in blue": Views of parents and professionals on Internet use for sexual purposes among young people with intellectual disabilities. Sexuality and Disability, 33(4), 533-544. doi: 533-544. doi:

Maïano, C., Aimé, A., Salvas, M-C., Morin, A. J. S., & Normand, C. (2016). Prevalence and correlates of bullying perpetration and victimization among school-aged youth with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 49-50, 181-195. doi:

MAXQDA 12. (2015). Getting started guide. Retrieved August 1, 2016, from

McClimens, A., & Gordon, F. (2009). People with intellectual disabilities as bloggers: What’s social capital got to do with it anyway. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 13, 19-30. doi:

McVilly, K., Stancliffe, R. J., Parmenter, T. R., & Burton-Smith, R. (2006). ‘I get by with a little help from my friends’: Adults with intellectual disability discuss loneliness. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 19, 191-203. doi:

Mineur, T. (2013). Skolformens komplexitet - elevers erfarenheter av skolvardag och tillhörighet i gymnasiesärskolan. [The complexity of a special type of school]. Doctoral thesis from The Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Halmstad University.

Molin, M. (2008). Delaktighet i olika världar - om övergången mellan gymnasiesärskola och arbetsliv. [Different worlds of participation - the transition from upper secondary special programs to working life for pupils with intellectual disabilities]. Postdoctoral report. Högskolan Väst/University West, Sweden.

Molin, M., & Gustavsson, A. (2009). Belonging and multidimensional self-expectations: Transition from upper secondary special programs to working life for pupils with intellectual disabilities in Sweden. La nouvelle revue de l’adaptation et de la scolarisation, 4(48), 255-265.

Molin, M., Sorbring, E., & Löfgren-Mårtenson, L. (2015). Parents and teachers views on Internet and social media usage by pupils with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 19(1), 22-33. doi:

Morgan, S. (2004). Positive risk taking: An idea whose time has come. Health Care Risk Report. Retrieved from

Näslund, R., & Gardelli, Å. (2012). ‘I know, I can, I will try’: Youths and adults with intellectual disabilities in Sweden using information and communication technology in their everyday life. Disability and Society, 28(1), 28-40. doi:

Normand, C., & Sallafranque-St-Louis, F. (2016). Cybervictimization of young people with an intellectual or developmental disability: Risks specific to sexual solicitation. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 29, 99-110. doi:

Palmer, S. B., Wehmeyer, M. L., Davies, D. K., & Stock, S. E. (2012). Family members’ reports of the technology use of family members with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56(4), 402-414. doi:

Parsons, S., Daniels, H., Porter, J., & Robertson, C. (2006). The use of ICT by adults with learning disabilities in day and residential services. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(1), 31-44. doi:

Piškur, B., Daniëls, R., Jongmans, M. J., Katelaar, M., Smeets, R., Norton, M., & Beurskens, A. (2014). Participation and social participation: Are they distinct concepts? Clinical Rehabilitation, 28, 211-220. doi:

Priebe, G., Mitchell, K., & Finkelhor, D. (2013). To tell or not to tell? Youth’s responses to unwanted Internet experiences. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 7(1), article 6. doi:

Salimkhan, G., Manago, A., & Greenfield, P. (2010). The construction of the virtual self on MySpace. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 4(1), article 1. Retrieved from

Schalock, R. L., Borthwick-Duffy, S. A., Bradley, V. J., Buntinx, W. H. E., Coulter, D. L., Craig, E. M., … Yeager, M. H. (2010). Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (11th ed.). Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. doi:

Seale, J. K. (2001). The same but different: The use of the personal home page by adults with Down Syndrome as a tool for self-presentation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3), 343-352. doi:

Seale, J. K. (2007). Strategies for supporting the online publishing activities of adults with learning difficulties. Disability and Society, 22(2), 173-186. doi:

Seale, J. K. (2014). The role of supporters in facilitating the use of technologies by adolescents and adults with learning disabilities: A place for positive risk-taking. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29(2), 220-236. doi:

Sharabi, A., & Margalit, M. (2011). Virtual friendships and social distress among adolescents with and without learning disabilities: The subtyping approach. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 26(3), 379-394. doi:

Shpigelman, C.-N., & Gill, C. J. (2014). How do adults with intellectual disabilities use Facebook? Disability and Society, 29(10), 1601-1616. doi:

Sveningsson, M. (2014). “I don’t like it and I think it’s useless, people discussing politics on Facebook”: Young Swedes’ understandings of social media use for political discussion. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 8(3), article 8. doi:

Thoreau, E. (2006). Ouch!: An examination of the self-representation of disabled people on the Internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 442- 468. doi:

Wells, M., & Mitchell, K. J. (2014). Patterns of Internet use and risk of online victimization for youth with and without disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 48(3), 204-213. doi:

Willis, P., & Trondman, M. (2002). Manifesto for ethnography. Cultural Studies - Critical Methodologies, 2, 394-402. doi: