Technical Standards in Social Work Education
What They Are and Why They Matter
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18060/25210Keywords:
technical standards, social work education, gatekeeping, professional behavior, disability accommodationsAbstract
Following larger developments within professional education, schools of social work have increasingly adopted technical standards as non-academic criteria for program admission and continuation. This paper examines the emergence of technical standards within schools of social work, articulates the distinction from and overlap with other forms of non-academic admissions and retention criteria, and considers their use in relation to the larger literature on gatekeeping in social work. Drawing on select legal cases, this review paper contemplates possible challenges associated with the implementation of technical standards, including issues related to disability law and due process. We argue that the development and implementation of technical standards in social work education raises complex questions related to inclusion and equity and poses unique challenges and opportunities for a relational and behavioral profession grounded in interpersonal skill development. Despite challenges, development of technical standards in schools of social work is worthwhile and can help manage the delicate and often difficult balance between serving as student-focused educators and professional gatekeepers.
References
Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. (2015). Guidance for the accreditation standards and key elements for the professional program in pharmacy leading to the doctor of pharmacy degree. https://www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/GuidanceforStandards2016FINAL.pdf
Ailey, S. H., & Marks, B. (2016). Technical standards for nursing education programs in the 21st century. Rehabilitation Nursing, 42(5), 245-253. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnj.278
Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (1990). https://www.ada.gov/pubs/adastatute08.htm
Anderson, G. (2021, February 15). Personal or professional? Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2021/02/15/u-tennessee-pharmacy-student-suing-over-vague-professionalism-codes
Babbitt, E., & Lee, B. A. (2016). Accommodating students with disabilities in clinical and professional programs: New challenges, new strategies. Journal of College and University Law, 42(1), 119-158. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jcolunly42&div=6&g_sent=1&casa_token=&collection=journals
Blacklock, B., & Montgomery, T. (2016). Understand technical standards in health science and medical education. Disability Compliance for Higher Education, 21, 7-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/dhe.30188
Bogo, M., Regehr, C., Woodford, M., Hughes, J., Power, R., & Regehr, G. (2006). Beyond competencies: Field instructors’ descriptions of student performance. Journal of Social Work Education, 42(3), 579-593. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2006.200404145
Cheney, G., & Ashcraft, K. (2007). Considering “The Professional” in communication studies: Implications for theory and research within and beyond the boundaries of organizational communication. Communication Theory, 17(2), 146-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00290.x
Collins, S. (2004). Mental health difficulties and the support needs of social work students: Dilemmas, tensions and contradictions. Social Work Education: The International Journal, 25(5), 446-460. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470600738809
Council on Social Work Education [CSWE]. (2015). Educational policy and accreditation standards for baccalaureate and masters’ social work programs. https://www.cswe.org/getattachment/Accreditation/Standards-and-Policies/2015-EPAS/2015EPASandGlossary.pdf.aspx
Davis, M. D. (2016). We were treated like machines: professionalism and anti-Blackness in social work agency culture [Masters Thesis, Smith College, Northampton, MA]. https://scholarworks.smith.edu/theses/1708
Dillon, J. (2007). The conundrum of balancing widening participation with the selection of suitable students for social work education. Social Work Education, 26(8), 827-841. https://do.org/10.1080/02615470601140609
Dykes, G. (2011). The implications of adverse childhood experiences for the professional requirements of social work. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 47(4), 521-533. https://doi.org/10.15270/47-4-120
Elpers, K., & FitzGerald, E. A. (2013). Issues and challenges in gatekeeping: A framework for implementation. Social Work Education, 32(3), 286-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2012.665867
Ferro-Lusk, M. (2017). A systemwide review of technical standards. Disability Compliance for Higher Education, 23(5), 7-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/dhe.30370
GlenMaye, L., & Bolin, B. (2007). Students with psychiatric disabilities: An exploratory study of program practices. Journal of Social Work Education,43(1), 117-132. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2007.200404112
Gonzalez, H. C., & Hsioa, E.-L. (2020). Disability inclusion in nursing education. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 15(1), 53-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2019.08.012
Halpern v. Wake Forest University Health Sciences, 669 F.3d 454 (4th Cir. 2012).
Holley, L., Charles, J., Kondrat, D., & Walter-McCabe, H. (2020). Supports and gatekeeping: Experiences of schools of social work with students with mental health conditions. Journal of Social Work Education, AHEAD-OF-PRINT, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2020.1798312
Holmstrom, H. (2014). Suitability for professional practice: Assessing and developing moral character in social work education. Social Work Education, 33(4), 451-468. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2013.847914
Huff, M., & Hodges, J. (2010). A practical guide for developing effective technical standards in social work programs. Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 15(2), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.5555/basw.15.2.006445758x081026
Hylton, M. E., Manit, J., & Messick-Svare, G. (2017). Gatekeeping and competency-based education: Developing behaviorally specific remediation policies. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 37(3), 249-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2017.1313359
Kezar, L., Kirschner, K., Clinchot, D., Laird-Metke, E., Zazove, P., & Curry, R. H. (2019). Leading practices and future directions for technical standards in medical education. Academic Medicine, 94(4), 520-527. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002517
Lee v. Seton Hill University, No. 2:2016cv01581, 2017 WL 7513319 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 25, 2017).
Marom, L. (2019). Under the cloak of professionalism: Covert racism in teacher education, Race Ethnicity and Education, 22(3), 319-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2018.1468748
Matt, S. B., Maheady, D., & Fleming, S. E. (2015). Educating nursing students with disabilities: Replacing essential functions with technical standards for program entry criteria. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 28(4), 461-468.
Mazza, E. (2015). Working with students with psychiatric disabilities or other emotional problems. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 35(4), 425-448. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2015.1066916
National Association of Social Workers [NASW]. (2017). Code of ethics. https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English
National Council of State Boards of Nursing. (1997). Guidelines for using results of functional abilities studies and other resources. Nursing Practice & Educational Committee. NCSBN. https://www.ncsbn.org/1996_part4.pdf
Neal v. University of North Carolina and East Carolina University, No. 5:17-CV-00186-BR, 2018 WL 2027730 (E.D.N.C. May 1, 2018).
Regher, C., Stalker, C., Jaccobs, M., & Pelech, W. (2001). The gatekeeper and the wounded healer. The Clinical Supervisor, 20(1), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.1300/J001v20n01_10
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, § 504, 29 U.S.C. § 794 (1973). https://www.dol.gov/agencies/oasam/centers-offices/civil-rights-center/statutes
Ryan, M., McCormack, J, & Cleak, H. (2006). Student performance in field education placements: The findings of a 6-year Australian study of admissions data. Journal of Social Work Education, 42(1), 67-84. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2006.200303106
Shannon, J. P. (1998). Who is an “otherwise qualified law student?” A need for law schools to develop technical standards. University of Florida Journal of Law and Public Policy, 10(1), 57-84.
Southeastern Community College v. Davis, 442 U.S. 397 (1979).
Sowbel, L. R., & Miller, S. E. (2015). Gatekeeping in graduate social work education: Should personality traits be considered? Social Work Education, 34(1), 110-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2014.953046
Tam, D., & Coleman, H. (2009). Construction and validation of a professional suitability scale for social work practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 45(1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2009.200500527
Thomas, J. T. (2016). Adverse childhood experiences among MSW students. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 36(3), 235-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2016.1182609
Todd, S., Asakura, K., Morris, B., Eagle, B., & Park, G. (2019). Responding to student mental health concerns in social work education: Reflective questions for social work educators. Social Work Education, 38(6), 779-796. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2018.1563591
Warters v. Laura et al., No. 3:10-cv-850 (GLS/DEP), 2013 WL 371661 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 29, 2013).
Wayne, R. H. (2004). Legal guidelines for dismissing students because of poor performance in the field. Journal of Social Work Education, 40(3), 403-414. https://doig.org/10.1080/10437797.2004.10672296
Zerden, L. D. S., Naylor, S. M., Thomas, S., Brigham, R. B., & Bailey, T. (2019). Defining the minimum expectation of MSW students: Implementation and application of technical standards. Journal of Social Work Education, 57(3), 534-544. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2019.1671269
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Rachel Schwartz, Laura Curran
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
