Identifying Indicators of High-Conflict Divorce Among Parents
A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18060/26384Keywords:
forensic social work, high-conflict divorce, high-conflict parents, high-conflict separation, systematic reviewAbstract
The burgeoning field of forensic social work supports clients engaged in the legal system. Forensic social work professionals working in family court will often be called upon to assess family dynamics, provide treatment to reduce maladaptation post-divorce, and advise divorcing parents as they navigate the complexities of court. Of particular interest to the forensic social work field are the various risks and protective factors that escalate or mitigate interparental conflict throughout the divorce process. Interparental conflict is a primary moderator accounting for psychological and physiological differences between children of divorced parents and children with intact parents. This systematic review examined the factors that contribute to conflict in divorcing parents and ways to identify high-conflict cases,. Peer-reviewed articles (n=11) were systematically selected using rigorous methods, including PRISMA-P protocols for systematic reviews and database searches using the search string “conflict AND divorce*.” Articles were extracted to identify themes of varying levels of conflict. There is no consistent definition of high conflict in pre-divorce parents, and recent articles offer new conceptualizations of this construct. All studies that met inclusion criteria for the review identified at least one of five themes of pre-divorce conflict: conflict resolution/communication, social network, parent characteristics, satisfaction with agreements, and pervasive mistrust.
References
*References marked by an asterisk reflect articles reviewed and included in this study.
Amato, P. R. (1993). Children’s adjustment to divorce: Theories, hypotheses, and empirical support. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55(1), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.2307/352954
Amato, P. R. (2005). The impact of family formation change on the cognitive, social, and emotional well-being of the next generation. Future of Children, 15(2), 75-96. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2005.0012
*Anderson, S. R., Anderson, S. A., Palmer, K. L., Mutchler, M. S., & Baker, L. K. (2010). Defining high-conflict. American Journal of Family Therapy 39(1), 11-27, https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2010.530194
Arditti, J. A., & Kelly, M. (1994). Father’s perspectives of their co-parental relationships postdivorce: implications for family practice and legal reform. Family relations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 43(1), 61-67. https://doi.org/10.2307/585143
Benjamin, M., & Irving, H. (2001). Money and mediation: Patterns of conflict in family mediation of financial matters. Mediation Quarterly, 18, 349-361. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.3890180404
*Bergman, A., & Rejmer, A. (2017). Parents in child custody disputes: Why are they disputing? Journal of Child Custody, 14, 134-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2017.1365320
Birnbaum, R. & Bala, N. (2010). Towards a differentiation of “high conflict” families: An
analysis of social science and Canadian case law. Family Court Review, 48(3), 403-416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01319.x
Bonach, K. (2005). Factors contributing to quality coparenting: Implications for family policy. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 43(3-4), 79-103. https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v43n03_05
Booth, A., & Amato, P. R. (2001). Parental predivorce relations and offspring postdivorce well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(1), 197-212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00197.x
Brooks, J., McCluskey, S., Turley, E., & King, N. (2015). The Utility of template analysis in qualitive psychology research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(2), 202-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.955224
Buchanan, C., & Heiges, K. (2001). When conflict continues after the marriage ends: Effects of post-divorce conflict on children. In J. Grych & F. Fincham (Eds.), Interparental conflict and child development (pp. 337-362). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527838.015
Cramer, P. (2000). Defense mechanisms in psychology today: Further processes for adaptation. American Psychologist, 55(6), 637-646. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.6.637
*Cohen, O., & Finzi-Dottan, R. (2012). Defense mechanisms and negotiation as predictors of co-parenting among divorcing couples: A dyadic perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 30(4), 430-456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512458657
Emery, R. E. (1994). Renegotiating family relationships: Divorce, child custody, and mediation. Guilford Press.
Ferraro, A., Malespin, T., Oehme, K., Bruker, M., Opel, A. (2016). Advancing co-parenting education: toward a foundation for supporting positive post-divorce adjustment. Child Adolescent Social Work Journal, 33, 407-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-016-0440-x
*Finzi-Dottan, R., & Cohen, O. (2014). Predictors of parental communication and cooperation among divorcing spouses. Journal of Child and Family Studies 23, 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10591-004-1972-3
Gyrch, J. (2005). Interparental conflict as a risk factor for child maladjustment: Implications for the development of prevention programs. Family Court Review, 43(1) 97-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2005.00010.x
Hald, G. M., Strizzi, J. M., Cipric, A., & Sander, S. (2019). The Divorce Conflict Scale. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 61(2), 83-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2019.1627150
Johnston, J. R. (1994). High-conflict divorce. Children and Divorce 4(1), 165-182. https://doi.org/10.2307/1602483
Littell, J. H., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195326543.001.0001
Maccoby, E. E., & Mnookin, R. H. (1992). Dividing the child: Social and legal dilemmas of custody. Harvard University Press.
Malcore, S. A., Windell, J., Seyuin, M., & Hill, E. (2009). Predictors of continued conflict after divorce or separation: Evidence from a high-conflict group treatment program. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 51(1), 50-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502550903423297
Mazur, E., Wolchik, S. A., Virdin, L., Sandler, I. N., West, S. (1999). Cognitive moderators of children's adjustment to stressful divorce events: the role of negative cognitive errors and positive illusions. Child Development, 70(1), 231-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00017
Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., PRISMA-P Group. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
Neff, R., & Cooper, K. (2004). Parental conflict resolution: Six-, twelve-, and fifteen-month follow-ups of a high-conflict program. Family Court Review, 42(1), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1531244504421008
*Polak, S., & Saini, M. (2018). The complexity of families involved in high-conflict disputes: A postseparation ecological transactional framework. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2018.1488114
*Ponzetti, J. J., & Cate, R. M. (2008). The developmental course of conflict in the marital dissolution process. Journal of Divorce, 10, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1300/J279v10n01_01
Saini, M., & Birnbaum, R. (2007). Unraveling the label of “high-conflict”: What factors really count in divorce and separated families. Journal of the Ontario Association of Children’s Aid Societies, 51(1), 14-20. https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/95335/1/Unraveling%20the%20label%20of%20high%20conflict_Saini.pdf
Salts, C. J. (1985). Divorce stage theory and therapy: Therapeutic implications throughout the divorcing process. Journal of Psychotherapy & The Family 1(3), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1300/J287v01n03_03
Scafidi, B. (2008). The taxpayer costs of divorce and unwed childbearing: First-ever estimates for the nation and all fifty states. Institute for American Values. https://fluxconsole.com/files/item/441/56084/Taxpayer-Costs-of-Divorce-and-Unwed-Childbearing.pdf
*Seirup, A. (2014). Conflict tactics in high-conflict divorce as informed by individual personality traits [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts School of Clinical Psychology]. ProQuest Dissertations.
*Smyth, B. M., & Moloney, L. J. (2017). Entrenched postseparation parenting disputes: The role of interparental hatred? Family Court Review, 55(3), 404-416. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12294
*Smyth, B. M., & Moloney, L. J. (2019). Post-separation parenting disputes and the many faces of high-conflict: Theory and research. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 40, 74-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/anzf.1346
Stewart, R. (2001). The early identification and streaming of cases of high-conflict separation and divorce: A review. Her majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/fl-lf/divorce/2001_7/pdf/2001_7.pdf
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 1-10.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Van der Wal, R., Finkenauer, C., & Visser, M. M. (2018). Reconciling mixed findings oof children’s adjustment following high-conflict divorce. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28, 468-478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1277-z
Visser, M., Finkenauer, C., Shoemaker, K., Kluwer, E., van der Rijken, R., van Lawick, J, Bom, H., Clsien de Schipper, J., & Lamers-Winkelman, F. (2017). I’ll never forgive you: High-conflict divorce, social network, and co-parenting conflicts. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26, 3055-3066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0821-6
Wolfinger, N. H. (2005). Understanding the divorce cycle: The children of divorce in their own marriages. Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Premela Deck, Sarah Eisensmith, Brittany Skinner, Jacqueline Cafaro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
